Re: Syndicomm Scam

[Eric Rucker <bhtooefr@gmail.com>]

On Saturday, April 27, 2013 12:57:15 PM UTC-4, Bill Buckels wrote:
<snip>
>
> No, it's broader, diminutive tactics ("claim it to be") don't work here 
> (that's bullying and we Canadians don't tolerate bullying either:)... it's a 
> right that I have to a defense if I choose...
> 
<snip>
> 
> Fair Dealing provides me with defensible and timely access to published or 
> unpublished works even if my use is research for profit... saying that Fair 
> Dealing is like some US concept of Fair Use is analoguos saying that the  
> Internet is like DOS 3.3 because both are accessed through a computer.
> 
<snip>
>
> That is only one part of the Fair Dealing multi-part defence... just because 
> someone is authorized and someone else has a Copyright and thinks that 
> because they can be found everything is OK doesn't mean my rights as a user 
> to being fairly dealt with have not been ignored, (effectively abandoning 
> the product).

Specific citations of Canadian law or exact language from Canadian court rulings, that would allow a Canadian to ignore copyright (not just apply to a copyright tribunal, which only seems to be an option if the copyright holder can't be found) on a product that the copyright holder can be found, but the copyright holder is not selling the good? Because I couldn't find one.