On 01/29/2012 10:51 PM, Alex Freed wrote:
On 1/29/2012 1:21 PM, Steve Nickolas wrote:On Sun, 29 Jan 2012, Kevin Dady wrote:and it depends on the II ... my //c has a cmos version in it for instanceI think he meant the original ][. All //cs have 65C02s. -uso.If I remember right the timing issue can be solved by replacing some 74LSxxx chips with newer 74HCTxxx equivalents.
There's a one-jumper-wire hack that permits an original ][ or ][+ to work with a CMOS 65C02. No chip replacement needed (other than CPU, of course).