[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PC or Mac?
In article <a3cb67$r8k$1@merope.saaf.se>, Paul Schlyter <pausch@saaf.se> wrote:
>In article <slrna5jbl9.21.byron@b60z27hbb464i.ab.hsia.telus.net>,
>Byron Q. Desnoyers Winmill <byron@b60z27hbb464i.ab.hsia.telus.net> wrote:
>>
>>Mimick does not imply compatibility with software in this case, but
>>wetware. A number of companies jumped on the GUI bandwagon thanks
>>to Apple popularising the GUI. To name a few products: GEM, GEOS,
>>Amiga's OS, BeOS, OS/2, Windows. The GUI elements in all of these
>>systems (except maybe Amiga, which I have no experience with) are
>>quite similar. Many of these elements clearly came from Apple's
>>offering.
>
>..and Apple in turn "borrowed" the GUI idea from Xerox...
Apple borrowed (or bought) far less from Xerox than Windows borrowed
from the Mac.
>In turn, Apple has borrowed some other ideas because they were
>good: expansion slots (missing in early Mac's),
The idea was "borrowed" from the S-100 machines, if that.
>IDE harddisks (cheaper),
Alas.
>and the PC diskette format (good because then you can
>transfer diskettes between machines).
To this day, Apple does not use the PC diskette format. They did switch
to the same low-level format when they went to 1440K diskettes, but the
high-level format never changed.
>Was the GUI ever patented?
You can't legitimately patent an idea. Many elements of the GUI have
been patented, however. (including, I believe, the "trash can")
--
Matthew T. Russotto mrussotto@speakeasy.net
=====
Dmitry is free, but the DMCA survives. DMCA delenda est!
"Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice, and moderation in pursuit
of justice is no virtue."