[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The Apple ][ was cool!

Subject: Re: The Apple ][ was cool!
From: russotto@user138.dsli.com (Matthew Russotto)
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 18:00:54 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2, comp.sys.cbm, comp.sys.sinclair, comp.sys.tandy
Organization: DiS(L)organized
References: <3B511638.E704ED11@usa.net> <cXa57.23245$JN6.4851446@news1.rdc1.mi.home.com> <1ewrul3.1lppa9z118k0snN%dempson@actrix.gen.nz> <1Pi57.24421$JN6.5039756@news1.rdc1.mi.home.com>
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:10983 comp.sys.cbm:18577 comp.sys.sinclair:45327 comp.sys.tandy:3489

In article <1Pi57.24421$JN6.5039756@news1.rdc1.mi.home.com>,
william strutts <wrstrutts1@nospam.home.com> wrote:
>
>
>than the other 16 bit computers of its day.  I think they were afraid
>that the 16-bit bus could back fire on them if they marketed the Mac
>as a 32-bit computer.

Apple DID market the Mac as a 32 bit computer for a time.
-- 
Matthew T. Russotto                                russotto@pond.com
"Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice, and moderation in pursuit
of justice is no virtue." 
=====
Free Dmitry Sklyarov!                              DMCA delanda est!
http://ebookweb.com/news/tech.20010716.elcomsoft.roush.htm

Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Apple ][ was cool!
  - From: Darren Salt <news@youmustbejoking.demon.cu.invalid>

References:
- The Apple ][ wasn't crap!
  - From: Jeff Thomas <a2forever@usa.net>
- Re: The Apple ][ was cool!
  - From: "william strutts" <wrstrutts1@nospam.home.com>
- Re: The Apple ][ was cool!
  - From: dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson)
- Re: The Apple ][ was cool!
  - From: "william strutts" <wrstrutts1@nospam.home.com>

Prev by Date: Re: The Apple ][ was cool!
Next by Date: Re: If you could design a $300 homecomputer today, what would you choose?
Previous by thread: Re: The Apple ][ was cool!
Next by thread: Re: The Apple ][ was cool!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread