[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PC Transporter OS
In article <3B4E7A1F.523AE3EB@inebraska.com>,
Roy Miller <millers@inebraska.com> wrote:
> william strutts wrote:
>
>> The last version of Windows that would run on an XT
>> class computer would be Windows 3.0. Windows 3.1
>> would only work on a 80386 or better.
>
> Windows 3.1 will run on a 286 or better. Win 95 dropped the 286 and the
> 386SX.
Why shouldn't Win95 be able to run on the 386SX? It can run 32-bit
code just as well as the 386DX - the only difference is that the
speed of execution will be slower on the SX.
I wouldn't want to run Win95 on anything less than a 486 though .... it
would just be too slow on a 386 (DX as well as SX).
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Schlyter, Swedish Amateur Astronomer's Society (SAAF)
Grev Turegatan 40, S-114 38 Stockholm, SWEDEN
e-mail: pausch at saaf dot se or paul.schlyter at ausys dot se
WWW: http://hotel04.ausys.se/pausch http://welcome.to/pausch