[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The Apple ][ was crap
- Subject: Re: The Apple ][ was crap
- From: "william strutts" <wrstrutts1@home.com>
- Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 02:31:37 GMT
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2, comp.sys.cbm, comp.sys.sinclair, comp.sys.tandy
- Organization: Excite@Home - The Leader in Broadband http://home.com/faster
- References: <Ne027.5153$EF2.553330@typhoon.nyroc.rr.com> <iO427.50$UE.92179@nnrp3.sbc.net>
- Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:10152 comp.sys.cbm:17570 comp.sys.sinclair:43945 comp.sys.tandy:3113
Steve Jobs is GOD. ;-)
--
--
William R. Strutts - wrstrutts1@home.com - Whatever!
C'est moi! http://www.facelink.com/wrstrutts
Just hacking away...
"Mo" <mygranny@'nospam'swbell.net> wrote in message
news:iO427.50$UE.92179@nnrp3.sbc.net...
> I don't know about that, the Aplle][+ played a pretty good game of "Temple
> of Asphai". While I'll agree that the Apple][e and the Apple][c were total
> crap, the 2+ was a damn fine machine. It was one of the first sporting
> swappable PCB cards and an awesome library of 3rd party software. I never
> cared much for the MACS either. And yes I too believe that Steve Jobs is a
> "damn psychotic assclown".
> Mo
>
> RaYzor wrote in message ...
> >The Apple ][ series was a travesty to home and educational computing.
> Armed
> >with the ugliest color palette known to man, and Steve "I'm a Damn
> Psychotic
> >Assclown" Jobs at the head of the company, the Apple ][ failed to sell as
> >many units as the Commodore 64, and managed to have worse graphics than
the
> >useless Sinclair Spectrum. But it WAS better than anything Radio Shack
> sold
> >in the 80's (then again what wasn't?)
> >
> >.. and yes before you start, the ][ GS _WAS_ an improvement, but not by
> >much .... and this is NOT about the GS.
> >
> >Discuss, citing examples as to why Commodore _OWNED_ Apple in sales and
> user
> >base... why Steve Jobs was a nut case ... and why TRS-80 sucks even worse
> >than Apple ][.
> >
> >RaYzor
> >
> >
> >
>
>