[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The Apple ][ was crap
- Subject: Re: The Apple ][ was crap
- From: "william strutts" <wrstrutts1@home.com>
- Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 18:01:30 GMT
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2, comp.sys.cbm, comp.sys.sinclair, comp.sys.tandy
- Organization: Excite@Home - The Leader in Broadband http://home.com/faster
- References: <Ne027.5153$EF2.553330@typhoon.nyroc.rr.com>
- Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:10116 comp.sys.cbm:17484 comp.sys.sinclair:43855 comp.sys.tandy:3074
God, you must be a glutton for punishment dude. First, you
start a flamewar in the Commodore/Tandy/Sinclair groups
and now here. You haven't had enough flaming so I suppose
you're here to see what trouble you can stir up.
--
--
William R. Strutts - wrstrutts1@home.com - Whatever!
C'est moi! http://www.facelink.com/wrstrutts
Just hacking away...
"RaYzor" <slorta@gern.org.net.com> wrote in message
news:Ne027.5153$EF2.553330@typhoon.nyroc.rr.com...
> The Apple ][ series was a travesty to home and educational computing.
Armed
> with the ugliest color palette known to man, and Steve "I'm a Damn
Psychotic
> Assclown" Jobs at the head of the company, the Apple ][ failed to sell as
> many units as the Commodore 64, and managed to have worse graphics than
the
> useless Sinclair Spectrum. But it WAS better than anything Radio Shack
sold
> in the 80's (then again what wasn't?)
>
> .. and yes before you start, the ][ GS _WAS_ an improvement, but not by
> much .... and this is NOT about the GS.
>
> Discuss, citing examples as to why Commodore _OWNED_ Apple in sales and
user
> base... why Steve Jobs was a nut case ... and why TRS-80 sucks even worse
> than Apple ][.
>
> RaYzor
>
>