Re: The Apple ][ was crap

[salfter@salfter.ncc74656.dyndns.org (Scott Alfter)]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article <jE027.5841$EF2.575714@typhoon.nyroc.rr.com>,
RaYzor <slorta@gern.org.net.com> wrote:
>Actually, no, see every year someone from c.s.sinclair comes in the C64
>group and says the C64 is crap.  We have fun with it for a while.  I thought
>that is about time that the TRUE crap machines and their owners got in on
>the fun .. Apple and Tandy!!

Got nothing better to do with your time than to stir the shit on Usenet? 
Most people got over these useless dick-size contests back in the 80s or
early 90s at the latest.  I happen to have machines from most of the
manufacturers covered in your cross-post (IIGS, IIe, II+. VIC-20, CoCo 2). 
My favorites are the Apple IIs, but the other machines are interesting in
their own ways (first learned BASIC on my grandfather's CoCo a couple of
decades ago).

If you're interested in real discussion, fine.  Otherwise, FOAD.  HAND, HTH.

  _/_
 / v \
(IIGS(  Scott Alfter (remove Voyager's hull number for email address)
 \_^_/  http://salfter.dyndns.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7SNDzVgTKos01OwkRAjMOAJ0V/7zB4WRMu6PqKYPGWfHRCxpC6gCfdyCv
ZeA2bFgstosBY9/TVP2gmxM=
=P9tW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----