[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: VGA for the IIgs - Different Approach?

Subject: Re: VGA for the IIgs - Different Approach?
From: Mark McDougall <msmcdoug@no.spam.iinet>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:26:15 +1100
In-reply-to: <92fbc012-e056-47cd-87c6-d8c53e193cd1@j34g2000prb.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
References: <92fbc012-e056-47cd-87c6-d8c53e193cd1@j34g2000prb.googlegroups.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
Xref: news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:18382

On 8/10/2011 3:07 PM, IUnknown wrote:

- expansion card
- shadows the IIgs memory


Already done.

<http://srkhdesigns.com/CarteBlanche.html>

Regards,

--
|              Mark McDougall                | "Electrical Engineers do it
|  <http://members.iinet.net.au/~msmcdoug>   |   with less resistance!"

Follow-Ups:
- Re: VGA for the IIgs - Different Approach?
  - From: IUnknown <stevementzer@gmail.com>

References:
- VGA for the IIgs - Different Approach?
  - From: IUnknown <stevementzer@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Disk 2 controller card issue, or maybe not?
Next by Date: SoundMeister
Previous by thread: Re: VGA for the IIgs - Different Approach?
Next by thread: Re: VGA for the IIgs - Different Approach?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread