[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: image to disk ?-- ways to transfer
- Subject: Re: image to disk ?-- ways to transfer
- From: Rubywand <rubywand@swbell.net>
- Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2001 15:48:16 -0600
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2, comp.emulators.apple2, comp.sys.apple2.comm
- Organization: SBC Internet Services
- References: <eSIf6.12751$tS.3130172@typhoon.austin.rr.com> <3A806502.7344C921@swbell.net> <Ulqg6.4848$o85.28004@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <3A83F20C.D9FC01A0@swbell.net> <fpTg6.8695$o85.48043@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
- Xref: supernews.google.com comp.sys.apple2:5947 comp.emulators.apple2:691 comp.sys.apple2.comm:87
Simon Biber writes ...
>
> If what you are sending is a hex dump like this:
> CALL-151
> 9D00:D3 9C 81 9E BD 9E 75 AA 93 AA
> :60 AA 00 9D BB B5 EA 9E 11 9F
> etc., then you will not get linefeeds except at the ends of the lines, so I
> don't think you would need per-character delays at 1200 baud. A line-end
> delay of 20-30 ms would be fine.
....
Yes. Your 'end of line' (of entries) would always come before you run out
of space on a 40-col line. The CR would force a linefeed and display update and
you would get the appropriate Line Delay at that time.
A format like yours would mean that a plain char send could be at max
speed because the Apple II is just putting a char in the buffer and on the
screen and this never forces a full display update.
At 1200 baud-- about 8ms/char-- there is no need for the sender to add a
char delay. You have plenty of time to get the just received char and deal with
it and be waiting when the next char arrives. You would come close to a full
120 chars/sec. You could probably go to 2400 baud with no problem.
Rubywand