Re: Source Code for OS?

[Quantum_Cat <quantum-no-spam@cotse.com>]

Hiya, Ol'coot...

Sheesh.. How do I get dragged into these things..  ;)

 *>It is unreasonable to presume that the possibility that I proposed does not
 *>exist, lacking complete proof that this possibility is not indeed true.

Au contraire.   It is unreasonable to assume the existance of anything and 
everything humans can possibly imagine, without evidence.  And extraordinary 
claims such as yours require extraordinary evidence.

Following YOUR logic, you must believe that there's an invisible Pink AllPowerful 
Unicorn in my basement.  Simply because you lack "complete proof that this 
possibility is not indeed true."

The burden of proof rests on your shoulders, Ol'coot.  Otherwise, everything that 
every moron utters would have to be true until proven false.

I much prefer withholding judgement until sufficient evidence presents itself.  
Disbelief as a default makes MUCH more sense.  ;)

 *> Atheists make the same error of most believers, of jumping to conclusions. 

But rational folks understand that humans make mistakes, and we surely know the 
most common ones.  We can train ourselves into NOT making those silly mistakes 
you're falling into so easily.  ;)

 *>They (as most believers) presume that their opinions are one and the same
 *>thing as truth.

But atheists aren't making supernatural claims, Ol'coot.  And in general, if a 
rational person makes a claim, he can at least present _some_ kind of evidence to 
back him up.  If not, then he deserves no more regard as anyone else making 
unfounded assertions.  Now why don't YOU present evidence for this "Hell", Hmmm?

 *>In statistics this is known as a type two statistical error. 

BS.  That's know as Turlette Technobabble.  ;)

 *>Even within mere human nature, hatefulness reaps hatefulness, and thus often
 *>hatefulness is not worth its price. 

But perhaps this time it is.  I'm willing to try.  ;)

 *>May you reap fully as you sow to be corrected from the error of your ways...
 *>ONLY to be corrected, and not for any degree of vengeance or retribution.

Cool.... And perhaps you can stop stealing software.  It's not moral to take 
someones property, intellectual or not, without their permission.

I don't foresee you doing any time for your trangressions, but it certainly makes 
you look like a hippocrite spouting morallistic judgments.  ;)

That loser Dorktor Tom is a lost cause.   WAY too much drug use in his past.  
He'll keep stealing and lying until he shuffles off to that stinky compost pile 
in the sky.

There may still be hope for you.  ;)


Vogons For a Turlette Free Apple II Community!

Quantum_Cat