[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What has changed in the Apple world last 6 months?
In article <EZVY5.445$LR2.30682@monger.newsread.com>,
russotto@wanda.vf.pond.com (Matthew T. Russotto) wrote:
>In article <3a33be18.10643802@news-server.kc.rr.com>,
>Dennis Doms <SynABit@kc.invalid> wrote:
>}[You know, I usually just lurk past these discussions, but I think
>}this one has been pretty good.]
>}
>}To visit back to the digital camera issue: I consider them a niche
>}product, but an important one. They're the modern "replacement" for
>}the hold "Polaroid" concept. They're more expensive, but they have
>[...]
>
>They can replace the Polaroid AND the compact 35mm. The main
>advantage my compact 35 has over my digital is weight.
>--
>Matthew T. Russotto russotto@pond.com
>"Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice, and moderation in pursuit
>of justice is no virtue."
You do lose significant resolution over a 35mm. For a lot of people
this may not be a practical factor. (We sometimes need to do
enlargements, so we use 35mm for some stuff. Actually, we still use
4x5 for some stuff.)
There's been talk that they've got high-density CMOS versions coming
that may (affordably) narrow this gap.
However, I think we're getting away from the Apple II connection. :)
--
Dennis Doms SynABit@kc.invalid
[ObSpamFoil: substitute "rr.com" for "invalid" above to reply via mail.]
"In the end, only kindness matters." - "Hands", Jewel Kilcher