Re: Snivelling Turlettes

[Quantum_Cat <quantum@N-o_S-p-a-m-cotse.com>]

So...  Once again, BlancoBunny leaves his Warren....

 *>> None of these points are required for a work to be protected under
 *>> copyright law.  If the work is copyrighted and you are
 *>>distributing it
 *>> against the copyright holder's wishes then you are indeed running
 *>>a pirate site. 

 *>I'm not denying that fact. 

Now wait a doggone minute, Warren...  You just got done demanding that I _NOT_ 
call it a pirate site because of your moronic "RosyWanker Requirements".  
Backpedalling?  Hypocrite?

 *>Those are my conditions for taking down
 *>data upon the request of a third party. If the copyright holder
 *>asks, upon proof of identity the information will be removed.

So, if a thief steals something, but returns it when caught, there is no theft?  
Heh...  Right.  Eat more fish, BlancoBunny... It's brain food, and you really 
need that.  ;)

 *>And even then the data may be left posted if it falls under a few
 *>loopholes that exist, such as fair use.

Heh... You'd best check out how the Copyright Act defines "fair use" first, fool.  
It doesn't say that "Warren can leave the files up however long he wants".  ;)

 *>~Warren


Vogons For a Turlette Free Apple II Community!

Quantum_Cat