[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Asimov Site
- Subject: Re: Asimov Site
- From: Roy and/or Janet Miller <millers@inetnebr.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 00:43:36 -0500
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- References: <967237775.39a6e08f725d6@webmail.cotse.com> <8o80ah$jcq$1@merope.saaf.se> <9qQp5.271$J91.36493@dca1-nnrp2.news.digex.net> <8ob3eo$k1$1@merope.saaf.se> <rVjq5.516$J91.65599@dca1-nnrp2.news.digex.net> <TYkq5.75215$rd1.13152160@typhoon-news1.southeast.rr.com> <39A9FFC2.5B2F7D4F@inetnebr.com> <0Qtq5.75581$rd1.13315324@typhoon-news1.southeast.rr.com>
- Xref: supernews.google.com comp.sys.apple2:1053
Tisk, tisk. The last refuge of the idiot is profanity and obscenity. Now where
are all those people who complain about Q-C? Hmmm? Where are you? Why aren't you
complaining about this zero?
Roy
**** **** wrote:
> Even though you are so grossly stupid or blind as to not realize how near
> ZERO the cost of distributing software is, in this day and age, there is one
> thing worth responding to, amidst all your f#$%ing bulls*&^.
>
> >Sounds like someone in the 50% who don't vote, but think they still have a
> >right
> >to complain about how things get (don't get) done here. ;-)
>
> Because of people like you, voting is completely, utterly, and undeniably
> WORTHLESS. On any office of signifigance, I have two, or if I'm incredibly
> lucky, three candidates to choose from. That 3rd is always a fringe
> candidate, and more often than not, a goofy flake. The other two are
> republocrats and demicans, and could be switched off with their colleagues
> mid-campaign, and I'm fairly confident nothing short of a DNA test would
> reveal the ruse. I don't have a vote, though I am of legal age in this
> country. No matter what syphillitic-whore-c*&t-sucking rotten s#$%stacks
> like you say to the contrary, I only have a vote when there is a candidate
> who is marginally decent, a rare occurence indeed. You more or less admit
> that there are elements in congress that buy and sell legislation to suit
> big money's needs, or did I get that wrong? Do you honestly want people to
> believe that if this is true, they really do have a vote? I thought I was
> supposed to be the one in "fantasyland", not you. Hell, even congress were
> magically uncorrupted, I'd still have to wade through the mire of human
> ignorance, stupidity, and outright indifference to make my choice. Hmm,
> Georgal Gorbush, or Georgal Gorbush for president... I'll have to consult
> here before I cast my ballot in November.