Re: Classifying Apple II systems for inventory purposes

[Warren Ernst <wernst@gmail.com>]

On Jul 11, 6:04 pm, mdj <mdj....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 11, 8:22 am, A2CPM <a...@wilserv.com> wrote:
>
> > Hmmm, if I use separate letters for all the
> > ROM versions of the IIgs, shouldn't I use separate letters for the
> > various ROM versions of the IIc?  Comments, PLEASE...
>
> It might be informative to capture the motherboard revision in
> addition to ROM version for a large collection, but there's a lot of
> manual checking involved.
>
> Matt

For what it's worth, it seems to me that any system that doesn't use C
for an Apple //c or G for an Apple IIGS (probably a ROM01) is going to
confuse people down the road. I see that E refers to an enchanced //e,
which is intuitive.

just a thought.

Warr