Re: Ancient wares and present values

["Paul Grammens" <grammens@svn.net>]

Roy and/or Janet Miller <millers@inetnebr.com> wrote in message
39591209.C08E5C5D@inetnebr.com">news:39591209.C08E5C5D@inetnebr.com...
> Paul Grammens wrote:
>
> > Roy and/or Janet Miller <millers@inetnebr.com> wrote in message
> > 3957CBC6.A949F62D@inetnebr.com">news:3957CBC6.A949F62D@inetnebr.com...
> > > Paul Grammens wrote:
> > >
> > > > But in any case, please stop wasting everyone's time with pedantic,
> > > > irrelevant dreck.  No one is going to pay the slightest heed to it.
> > > > -Paul
> > >
> > > You did.
> > >
> >
> > No, I didn't.
>
> Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary "heed vb - to pay attention, to take
notice
> of    n ATTENTION, NOTICE"  You paid heed to it, and then disregarded it.
> Pedantic, but you wasted the bandwidth to respond.
>

Ah, but that would depend on the meaning of "it".
But that's not the point, though it's clear that you're not too swift when
it comes to differentiating between the crucial and the trivial. Like QC,
you contribute nothing of value to CSA2.  While Rubywand and Dr. Tom have
whole websites and frequent posts that contribute to helping keep the Apple
II alive and well, you're just a waste of bandwidth. Get lost.
-Paul