Re: Who is Cturley2 ??

[Roy and/or Janet Miller <millers@inetnebr.com>]

Cturley2 wrote:

>
> OK, I (Cturley2) reply on all of the above:
>
> (A) DirtyFly misunderstood my email request.  I had asked him if he knew of any
> ISP in his country that might be interested in hosting a mirror site of Asimov.
>  I never asked him for access to his account or his ftp site!
>

Why do you respond to my post, and not that of Jeff Blakeney, or Penman?

>
> (B) Jay Edwards does not host an ftp site for me, never has and never will be
> asked to either.

Who said he did? In the context of the above posts however, he was assuring
"DirtyFly" that you are trustworthy, "absolutely" trustworthy, so that "DirtyFly"
could host such for you. I found that to distressing in light of emails that you
have sent to me, and others that I have read, such as on the Brutal Deluxe site.

> Why not?  Because I've never asked him to and have no
> intentions of every asking him such either.  Jay is a friend - that I've had

> several dealings with in the past - concerning hardware and computer systems
> sold to him - he was satisfied with our friendship and such sales to him, found
> me to be trustworthy in such matters - thus he replied: "Absolutely".

You never have learned to be terse have you?

>
>
> It as simply as that.
>
> Roy, why do you persist in making snide

There wasn't anything snide about my posting

> remakes concerning matter that involve
> me ever change you get with your posts to Apple II newsgroups

LOL - and you claim to have a Ph.D? "Piled Higher and Deeper" You couldn't even
pass a third grade English exam.  By the way, that was snide. Intentionally. I'm
getting a bit tired of your verbose tirades. And your baseless accusations. You
must have been away from home for the last few weeks, because this newsgroups was
interesting, informative, and peaceful. Until now. The only thing that has changed
is your presence. Oh well, as you have said many times, you aren't going away. But
it was nice while it lasted.

> - make dumb and
> nonfactual assumptions about me and base you entire perception of me on what
> gossip you hear from others?
>

Well, speaking of "dumb and nonfactual assumptions".... I base my perception of you
on: 1) your postings; 2) your emails to me; 3) the emails I've read on the Brutal
Deluxe site; 4) your ezine (May had a really ugly background, usually it's much
more tastefully done); 5) your website. I don't listen to gossip. I refused to
listen to third parties about Bev (that might surprise her) and I refused to listen
to third parties about you, until you validated their comments. Congratulations.
You have made your foe's case.

>
> To me - that makes no sense!  It's just not the sort of thing I'd expect from
> somebody like you who claims to be a moral and just minister.

I've never made any claims. I've never advertised my vocation here. And I have
tried, not always successfully, to respond here and anywhere else, consistently
with my faith. And while I am not ashamed of my faith, and am more that happy to
discuss my hope with anyone, I have never thought that this newsgroup was created
for a discussion of historic Christianity, or my branch of historic Christianity
(hint, my spiritual forefathers were called Puritans by their enemies.)

>
> Your logic and your posted comments, thoughts and assumptions on such things
> really disappoints me.
>
> -Tom

Get used to disappointment. My mission in life isn't to measure up to your
expectations. I have to answer to a much higher authority than you seem to think
you are.

Roy