[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GS WorldView May 2000 wrap



Hiya, Dorktor!  Where've you been keeping your putrid 
posterior for that two weeks?  I've missed you!

 *>On Mon, 12 Jun 2000 01:56:42 -0500, Rubywand <
rubywand@swbell.net>
 *>wrote:

OK... Note the date, Tom.  June 12th.  Got that?

 *>>Since June 2000 is due in a day or so, this seems like a 
good time to
 *>>post the final line up for the May issue (in case some 
readers missed 
 *>>late additions).
 *>>

Now I know you're math challenged as well has morally 
challenged, but this quote would indicate that it was written 
at least on May 31st, possibly May 30th.  Read it slowly if 
you must, and look up the hard words like "due".

 *>And, blakeney@home.com asked: 
 *><<Heh.  Did you queue this message up a couple weeks ago 
and forget to
 *>send it?  Please note that it is dated the 12th of June 
and you are
 *>saying June is coming up in a day or so.  :-)>>

Jeff:  Yeah.. I think this is how most everyone with a brain 
cell count over 12 would take it.  :)

 *>As the Editor of GS WorldView let me explain with an 
answer to your 'Heh'
 *>question and post.  GS WorldView is an online ezine, 
presented with monthly
 *>issues.  May has indeed come and gone -> June is here and 
the GS WorldView
 *>June issue is in a preview status (as of this posted 
reply).

Whoopee.  If you're going to "explain with an answer", you 
don't need to fluff it up with the obvious.  We know what GS 
WorldScrew is and how often you dump this sewage.

 *>Ref. URL:

 *>http://www.grin.net/~cturley/gsezine/GS.WorldView/v2000/
Jun/

 *>The GS Worldview - 'June Preview Issue' currently consist 
of about
 *>67 MB's of articles, archives, posts, graphics, sounds, 
fonts and such.

And you can buy cow manure by the ton.  Is this some subtle 
comparison?

 *>Rubywand was simply giving the lineup of what the May 
issue
 *>contains in it's final revised - online issue version.

Yeah..... We got that.  Jeff didn't make any remarks at all 
that would require you to give us this rehash of RosyWankers 
post.  But then you DO like to babble on.  Perhaps you think 
verbosity = intelligence.  :)

 *>The May issue (final revision) of GS WorldView (The on-
line journal of Apple
 *>II computing) contains about 72 MB's of articles, 
archives, posts, graphics,
 *>sounds, fonts and such.

Ah.. So you DO equate quality with quantity.  OK.  You have 
the quantity.  Anyone nuts enough to wade through 72 Megs of 
that sewage has to be nearly as demented as one who compiles 
72 Megs of sewage.  ;)


 *>Ref. URL:

 *>http://www.grin.net/~cturley/gsezine/GS.WorldView/v2000/
May/

Oh!  Oh!  And MY favorite!

http://www.grin.net/~cturley/gsezine/GS.WorldView/v2000/May/
Usenet/QC.revealed.txt

The purrfect article demonstrating your idiocy!

 *>So, Rubywand DIDN'T queue his posted message up a couple 
weeks ago
 *>and forget to send it, as you had assumed.

Uh.. Dumbshit.. You came to a conclusion without presenting 
any pertinent evidence.  

Since you have trouble remembering, it goes like this..  

June 12th.. Rosy posts.."Since June 2000 is due in a day or 
so"

Hey, if you REALLY want to address that, then go ahead.  
Personally, I have no problem with Rosy forgetting to post 
something for a few weeks.

Heck, I wouldn't mind all that much if YOU forgot to post 
anything for a few decades!  ;)

 *>We have a style that we use with GS WorldView - known as 
'Linear  Online

LOL!  Style?!?!  Good one, Charles!  And L O V E .. How bun 
warming!

My guess was that you used the "Swapping Erroneous Waste 
About Generally Everywhere" method.  ;D

 *>Volume Editing' for our ezine, which allows us to add to, 
modify and/or
 *> remove with revisions - any monthly volume and issue as 
needed in order

That's cool...  You have the opportunity to correct your 
screwups at will.  Trouble is, when you have > 70 Megs of 
screwups per issue, they tend to fossilize like maggots stuck 
in amber.

At least you DO delete the ones that could get you into legal 
trouble, or that embarrass you too much.  Don't worry... No 
one is archiving this crap but you.

 *> to meet the needs and desires of the Apple II users, the 
online community
 *> and GS WorldView readers.

Of course, few of those folks are likely to burrow through 
the garbage to find any of the new or revised droppings you 
leave behind.  But go ahead an knock yourself out.  Use of a 
bigger brick is recommended.  ;)

 *>Cheers,
 *>Tom

Vogons For a Turlette Free Apple II Community!

Quantum_Cat