[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Apple and the Holy War
- Subject: Re: Apple and the Holy War
- From: bctimes@hotmail.com (Forrest)
- Date: 2000/05/14
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- References: <8fgop4$719$1@merope.saaf.se> <dJmT4.101$W45.327@newsfeed.slurp.net> <8flk9o$hgi$1@merope.saaf.se> <pJwT4.603$W45.954@newsfeed.slurp.net> <8fmaov$q35$1@merope.saaf.se>
Somewhere, pausch@saafNOSPAM.se (Paul Schlyter) wrote:
>> Somewhere, pausch@saafNOSPAM.se (Paul Schlyter) wrote:
>>
>>>Why the 78 chars/line limit?
>>
>> Because that's what RJLissner picked.
>
>Why did he do that?
You'd have to ask him. Possibly to accommodate standard manuscript format
with two spaces after a sentence.
>That's a display issue, not an editor issue. Sometimes I encounter
>text files from the outside, with line lengths exceeding 80 or even
>255 characters. Why should a good editor puke at such a text file?
There's a difference between wrapping lines and "puking". There's also a
difference between a word processor and a text editor.
>> Never used AppleWorks, have you?
>
>Nope ... I've played with it one or twice but obviously I wasn't
>impressed, or else I would nave continued using it. Now I hardly
>remember anything about it.
Everyone else was, which is why it debuted at #2 on the Softalk Top Thirty its
first month, permanently moved to #1 the month after, and became the best
selling Apple II program of all time -- all with no advertising. At all. For
about six years.
As Tom "Uncle DOS" Weishaar put it, it was/is "as important a characteristic
of the Apple II as DOS, Applesoft, or the [System] Monitor."