[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GS WorldView - May2000 Pirate NEWS
*>Jeff Blakeney writes ...
*>>
*>> On Sat, 29 Apr 2000 17:31:42 -0500, Rubywand <
rubywand@swbell.net>
*>> wrote:
*>>
*>> > Dr. Tom is the one who accepted Howard's claim of
*>> > having permission to download BeagleWrite GS, located
*>> > the software, placed it in the GSWV May issue, added
*>> > screen shot pics and Text info files, and announced to
*>> > everyone thatBeagleWrite GS is available. That, as
anyone
*>> > who's ever done it knows, _is_ work.
*>>
*>> But did he take the time to make sure Howard did have
the proper
*>> permissions before making BeagleWriteGS available for
download? From
*>> his post it sounds like he just ASSUMED this fact from
some posts on
*>> Delphi.
Well, Jeff B. Delphi DOES have a more reliable and honest
crew hanging out there than the Turlette infested csa2
newsgroup.
Tom obviously knows that. :)
*> If Howard says he got permission, he probably did.
Well, seeing how Howard isn't a Turlette, I'd have to agree
too...
Of course, there's no law saying scum can't tell the truth
sometime.
*> When you are given permission to download a product
from wherever--
*>i.e. no specific source site was specified by Beagle or
even known of by
*>Howard-- the clear implication is that the product may be
offered for
*>downloading anywhere.
*>>
*>> By the way, Turley also took it upon himself to also
make BeagleDraw
*>> available as well and I don't remember hearing anywhere
that it has
*>> been reclassified.
Tisk, Jeff B. You KNOW Dorktor Tom can't do anything without
screwing it up... even when it something simple like going
through his collection of pirated goods and uploading it
after reclassification.
*> On the other hand, reclassification is not a
requirement for a product
*>to be available for downloading. The only actual
requirements are ...
Oh dear. Rosy, Rosy, Rosy.... Time to stop playing the
lawyer. Stop lying to the good folks of csa2. They know
better.
Reclassification IS a requirement for making a product
available for downloading. Repeating a lie just makes you a
habitual liar.
*>1- there is no reason to believe that availability for
downloading
*> would damage the product's value; and,
*>
*>2- there is no reason to believe that the owner of the
product would object.
And neither of these points are correct. Odd that a
supposedly intelligent Wanker like yourself hasn't found a
clue yet.
*> Howard's posting about BeagleWriteGS indicates
Beagle's attitude. At
*>the very least, it indicates that Beagle is aware of what
is going on in
*>Apple II Land. The basic requirements for making an item
available for
*>downloading appear to be met; and, there is good reason to
expect that, if
*>Beagle objects, Beagle will make the objection known.
Nah... If we see stolen goods, we don't have to wait to point
out the thief. If a bank officer steals your life savings,
but you don't know about it and don't object, it's still a
crime.
Or in otherwords, if a tree fell in the forest and crushed
RosyWanker's skull, would it cause brain damage? Answer:
No. His brain is in his colon.
*>>
*>> There is a proper way to handle stuff like this and I
hate to see
*>> users being confused when things aren't handled
properly.
*> ....
*> Yes; it is generally best to have clear, concrete
answers. But; this is
*>not always possible and, as already noted, not really
necessary.
If it's not possible, it's illegal. And it IS necessary.
Moron.
*> Even so, if you believe a public permission from
Beagle for the items
*>mentioned will be easy to obtain, why not followup on
Howard's efforts and
*>obtain the public permissions?
Howard is doing fine. Why would you have us duplicate
efforts, Rosy? Part of your 'divide and conquer' strategy?
And a nice cheerful Vogon Meow to RosyWanker,
Quantum_Cat
--
Anon news web interface. FAQ available for review at:
http://packetderm.cotse.com/cgi-bin/blockit.cgi