[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ADTPro Apple II

Subject: Re: ADTPro Apple II
From: dog_cow@macgui.com (D Finnigan)
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 16:12:20 +0000 (UTC)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: Mac GUI
References: <74bbd1d0-d1f6-4040-b859-636cec411815@v10g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
User-agent: Mac GUI City Usenet Posting
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.sys.apple2:23446

Toinet wrote:
> On 28 avr, 05:29, Michael J. Mahon <mjma...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>> I hope you find 3.5" floppies to be as reliable as 5.25" diskettes.
ï¿½;-)
>>
>> -michael ï¿½- ï¿½NadaNet 3.1: ï¿½http://home.comcast.net/~mjmahon
> 
> From my very own experience with tons of 3"5 disks, I find them less
> reliable than 5"25 disks,
> antoine
>

I always that was because of the data density: 3.5" disks have a bunch of
data crammed on a small surface, whilst 5.25" disks have less data on a
larger area.

-- 
]DF$

Mac GUI Vault - A source for retro Apple II and
Macintosh computing.
http://macgui.com/vault/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ADTPro Apple II
  - From: Warren Ernst <wernst@gmail.com>

References:
- Re: ADTPro Apple II
  - From: Toinet <antoine.vignau@laposte.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Carte Blanche R&D bits
Next by Date: Re: ADTPro Apple II
Previous by thread: Re: ADTPro Apple II
Next by thread: Re: ADTPro Apple II
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread