[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: not enough real programmers? (was Re: Byte Magazine: 18 Vintage issues, 1985-1986)
In article <7oln21$6dq$0@216.39.144.179>, Victoria Welch <vikki@oz.net> wrote:
>I was struck speechless. It took a while for me to figure out that it
>wasn't just exhaustion and stress, but he actually did say that to me.
>Very little surprises me anymore, that one did.
I've figured out what gets me about this guy. Even a slimey sales person
knows better than to blatently state that, so the worst sales person was
better than this guy. What -this- guy was, was a con man. Con men don't
give a rat's ass about others, don't see how they destroy the basic
underpinnings of civilization, which is based on trust, and should be
expelled on sight IMO.
>He has enough $$$$ to just replace it, not a big deal.
Still, the idea -might- get through, especially if you had a big gun to
back you up. <grin> (NOTE GRIN!)
>I think he has gotten away with this kind of thing for so long and made
>so much money doing it that he doesn't see anything wrong with what he
>does. He gets "respect from his peers" (sure as hell none from his
>subordinates) and significant financial renumeration, so what could be
>wrong with what he does? Carefully ignoring the bodies in his trail.
I doubt he -sees- the bodies in his trail, or maybe he doesn't see them as
bodies.
>(and would be frowned on by the local constabulary).
Details.
>yells at me "When I tell you to
>hop, you damn well better hop NOW". Problem? He was trying to get wall
>box holes cut in the wall and couldn't manage it (No, I didn't laugh in
>his face at that point, I was more than a little *issed).
He was your boss? Your boss is the only one who should feel free making
that statement, IMO. Anyone else should just be ignored. I want to try
that some time, just to see what happens. I expect to have enough in the
bank just in case something nasty happens. <grin>
--
Howard S Shubs hshubs@mindspring.com hshubs@bix.com
The Denim Adept Is this the right room for an argument?
SPAM: uce@ftc.gov postmaster@[127.0.0.1] abuse@[127.0.0.1]