Re: Misc replies

[quantum_cat@my-deja.com]

In article <37A94938.4C865536@swbell.net>,
  Rosywanker belched:
>
> Tony Ward writes ...
> >
> > In article <37A64F43.836503B3@swbell.net>, Rubywand
> > <rubywand@swbell.net> wrote:
> ....
>
> > > Someone who posts a message to such a forum has no business expecting to
> > > exclude his/her statements from reports produced by any specific individual.
> >
> > Perhaps, but the person would expect to be given credit for his words.
>  ....
>
>      All of the material seems to be credited-- Dr. Tom's KF exclusive is loaded

My, my, Rosy... "exclusive"?  You dumb fuck... The whole point is that he
swiped it ALL from Delphi's public forum and has the nerve to slap his
name on it and call it "exclusive".

Of course, that's just Turdley's nature, and we've come to expect that of
him, but why you trot about with his dick in your mouth is beyond me.

____
>
> quantum_cat@my-deja.com "wrote":
> >
>  ....
>
> > Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> > Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
>
>      Thank you for sharing what you know!
>

You bet!  I know that you're king of the weasel words, careless about the
rights of others, 2nd lieutenant of the Turlettes, and thankful that
Turdley doesn't have teeth that might bite your wanker off.

> _______
>
> Richard Bennett  <richard.b-0408992156070001@stan14.zip.com.au> wrote:
> >
> ....
> >
> > Good, fuck off.
>
>      Hey! You and quanchum need to get together.
>

So we can think of more ways to taunt you losers?

> (Hope you don't mind having your "work" quoted.)
>

Quote this please:  Rosywanker gives Dr. Tom head.

> _______
>
> maxjones@indy.net wrote:
> >
>  ....
>
> > Some of my words were included in the compilation, much to my dismay.
>  ....
>
>      Well, you did post them on one of the _public_ Apple II forums; so, why the
> "dismay"? Did you say something dumb?
>

Hmmm... We wouldn't want to say something "dumb" now would we... That's
Rosywankers territory..

>      Checked the report again. Your stuff looks like regular chatting about goings
> on at the Fest-- nothing especially dumb.
>
> > Of course, Charles Turley knew most of the posters whose words were used
> > would have denied him permission. Maybe that's why he opted against
> > doing the decent and respectful thing.
>  ....
>
>      The decent respectable thing to do was to report the events of, supposedly,
> "the major Apple II Event" of 1999. If news media reported and quoted only what
> the subjects of their reports wished reported and quoted, there would be no news.
>

Respectable to whom, you pus filled maggot?  You dodge the point about
Turdley's unethical behavior (swiping public quotes, but claiming an
"exclusive"), and try to paint someone ELSE as the injured party?
Because, asshole, the reports were out there... Just not on csa2.


> > IMO, Turley (and his lapdog Rudywand) knew exactly what they were doing
> > when they lifted those posts from Delphi without asking permission and
> > compiled them for their own use.
>
>     "Lapdog" appears to carry a pejorative taint!
>
>      I did not lift anything from any of the KF threads or contribute anything at
> all to Dr. Tom's fine report. (Actually, did not even read the report until it was
> published.)
>

Oh... You poor wussie.  So unjustly accused.  Eat shit.

>      Feel free to apologize.
>

OK.  I'm sorry your such a fucking idiot.


> > They knew exactly the type of reaction they would get, and got it.
> > That was the plan.
>  ....
>
> Plan???
>

Yeah. Planning involves thought.  Obviously not a property the Turlettes
possess.

> A "plan" (plot, conspiracy, ...) to make your bunch look like puffed-up boorish
> anal retentive screw-ups?
>

Oh Dear!  We've been encroaching on your territory once again.  (said as
we rapidly backpedal while scraping the shit off of our shoes).

> LOL! As if!
>

Ah.  If you only had some ethical sense... :(

Bye!



Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.