Warren Ernst wrote:
The reason you go with CF is because there are already a lot of CF- based storage cards in use in IIGS's and //e's, so it allows a user to swap storage cards between all their machines easily. I would seriously consider getting a //c because of this development, but not if I had to use SD cards instead of CF. -Warr On Jan 28, 10:08 pm, Osgeld <osg...@cheesefactory.us> wrote:A) why CF? its outdated and overly complex for an apple, SD in SPI mode would overrun it no issue
But it is trivial to use CiderPress to make a volume copy from CF <--> SD. I'm actually hoping for an SD version of CFFA--an "SDFA" card. ;-) CF is clearly on its way out, as prices and availability show. And the connector itself is a nightmare of tiny pins... -michael NadaNet 3.1 for Apple II parallel computing! Home page: http://home.comcast.net/~mjmahon/ "The wastebasket is our most important design tool--and it's seriously underused."