Re: ProSel 8 and 16

[supertimer@aol.com (Supertimer)]

ljsilicon@aol.com (LJSILICON) wrote:

>Bev wrote...
>
>>Paul, I have withdrawn my permission to ProSel's management to include my Y2K
>>bug fixes in a release of ProSel. We thought it would be a good idea to
provide
>>a safe, definitive version which would be useful for many years down the
road,
>>but I guess it wasn't. So much for trying to do a good thing.
>>
>
>Here we go again! Just like the I'm not releasing AppleWorks because there's a
>pirated copy! Can you say VAPORWARE? It sounds to me like another cry for
>attention on a product (upgrade) that never existed in the first place.

No, it means the product exists but now she's not going to release it with
ProSel.  You are going to have to ASK her to send it to you.  Or she
may choose to only give it to her subscribers.  It is up to her.  Bev has
never released vaporware before and has always made good on her
announcements of Y2K patches, so why should anyone doubt this one?
ProSel may be PD, but the patches are not.

I for the world do not understand why people are attacking Bev.  It is not
like she's been abusing any and all users like Nathan did.  There was a
misunderstanding between Bev and Mr. Turley and they've worked it
out among themselves.

Let us stop cheerleading (sorry to borrow the Nathanism) and fanning the
flames, ok?