Richard / slurred speech

[brian.hammack@rook.wa.com (Brian Hammack)]

 Richard chanted almost zenlike:

>  SCC(|     The other difference, and most important one, is a lack of
>      | programs that will operate under Marinetti. You can successfully
>
> <patiently waiting too, or is that waiting thirty...>

 RBC(| After your earlier slurs, you're still waiting patiently? I'm
     | impressed.

What is truly impressive is that I'm waiting despite your past and
present slurs.  I was wondering how long it would take before you
replied to anything I had posted, and I was not disappointed.

I've offered no "slurs" related to Marinetti, there is nothing bad to
say about the product.  I do criticize how it is the core of a field of
nonexistant-as-yet utilities, but only gently.  :)  The only commentary
I make is about the text and tone you use in your posts, but you should
be used to being chided about that (and in harsher terms than I have
ever used publicly).  Aim your weapon at someone who resorts to
personal attacks unrelated to your attitude or your software; I view
you the same way that I viewed Nathan -- an intelligent programmer who
cares about the Apple but isn't always user-friendly, and that the fact
that you are producing good works is the one saving grace you possess.

And may your 1999 be a good one, Richard.               << mushroom >>

 * 2qwk! 2.04 * "You go online, you get techno-weenievision." - J.Harris