Re: Gamma 65C Worth It?

Subject: Re: Gamma 65C Worth It?
From: "dott.Piergiorgio" <dott.PiergiorgioNIHON@KAIGUN.fastwebnet.it>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 10:19:00 +0100
In-reply-to: <KvadnVODjYIQAnPRnZ2dnUVZ_tednZ2d@giganews.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.cbm, comp.sys.apple2
References: <0534f73b-39dd-4566-b916-94d0a4094abc@30g2000yql.googlegroups.com> <KvadnVODjYIQAnPRnZ2dnUVZ_tednZ2d@giganews.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.sys.cbm:14757 comp.sys.apple2:21212

Il 25/11/2010 18:40, Michael J. Mahon ha scritto:

Joseph/Harry, if the past is any guide to the future,
no, it isn't worth it.

I concur with this, and point that the main limitation of the 6502architecture re. C language lies in the fixed stack of only 256 bytes.


Best regards from Italy,
dott. Piergiorgio.

References:
- Gamma 65C Worth It?
  - From: Harry Potter <maspethrose7@aol.com>
- Re: Gamma 65C Worth It?
  - From: "Michael J. Mahon" <mjmahon@aol.com>