[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
I think TempC Simple *is* worth it!
- Subject: I think TempC Simple *is* worth it!
- From: Harry Potter <maspethrose7@aol.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 15:33:41 -0800 (PST)
- Complaints-to: groups-abuse@google.com
- Injection-info: o4g2000yqd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=172.130.66.36; posting-account=xRocggoAAACFej4w6sQauoZjUP9yroE5
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.cbm, comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: http://groups.google.com
- User-agent: G2/1.0
- Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.sys.cbm:14766 comp.sys.apple2:21222
I know that I'm being annoiying by bugging all of you about TempC, but
I still believe in TempC. TempC Simple is a watered-down version of
TempC for DOS and can create C modules for you. I think it's faster
to use TempC Simple DOS than typing all your program's #includes and
basic structure yourself. TempC Simple is in its alpha stages and has
limited functionality but shows its intended functionality. Just make
sure you select the cc65 compiler--the others are unwritten. If you
want to try it out, e-mail me for a copy. My e-mail address is
maspethrose7@aol.com. If you e-mail me, please start the subject with
"To Joseph:" as I share my e-mail address.
-------------------
Joseph Rose, a.k.a. Harry Potter
Working magic in the computer community...or at least striving to! :(