Re: Nathan's farewell...

[supertimer@aol.com (Supertimer)]

joseph.m.barbey@uwrf.com wrote:

>I would have to agree.  Also, everybody seems to be saying good riddance.
>However, we don't have many public developers left, it seems.  To lose
>another one, reguardless of how people feel about his personality, is a
>great loss.  Personally, I looked forward to seeing new GUPPs posted.  It
>was nice to know somebody was working on squashing bugs for a system that
>was 'out of date' 5 years ago.  Linux has become my favorite operating
>system, but the Apple IIs, and especially the IIgs will always be my
>favorite computer.
>
>Farewell, Nate.  I at least will miss you.

I did not want him to leave.  I was prepared to put up with his bullshit
and appreciated his efforts for the A2.  I will NOT however say that
it was simply "his personality" that I disliked.  It was not I who
disliked him, but HE who abused most new users, myself included.

I am sorry if you do not agree, but to me, being a developer does
not entitle you to abuse others at will.  And I don't even LIKE or
USE sites like Asimov, so don't give me any "he only flamed
pirates" garbage...