Re: PLEASE STOP THE MAC AND MICROSOFT MESSAGES

["TheDM" <thedm@sunflower.com>]

And this was very productive.  [NOT!}   Everyone just needs to relax.

I'd rather see a hundred misguided mac questions than one flame. But then, I
possible just broke my own rule. I gues I just won't read my own post I just
made to avoid seeing a flame.




Nathan Mates wrote in message ...
>In article <6jtoqg$fk5$1@opal.southwind.net>,
>Randy Shackelford <shack@onyx.southwind.net> wrote:
>>I still think Apple's present as well as its past are topical in
>>groups which are devoted to Apple products. I might mention that
>>I've never seen anyone in any comp.sys.mac group go off when Apple
>>II questions show up there.
>
>   No, you're just the whitewashing apologist for Macintosh, Inc and
>the mindless lusers it leaves in its wake. Your feelings as to what's
>appropriate where have, as usual, NOTHING, to do with reality:
>Macintrash-ONLY posts belong in the Macintosh newsgroups.
>
>   If the Mac newsgroups had a continual and constant stream of
>offtopic, misguided folks bugging them, they'd get pretty annoyed,
>too. Learn what is appropriate, where, but if you haven't managed to
>learn what the difference is between an Apple II and a Mac in the
>*many* years of the newsgroups being apart, there's probably no hope
>for your ever learning to be a productive member of usenet.
>
>   Randy, your continual inability to deal with what belongs where
>should earn you endorsements from "The Internet for Dummies" line of
>books as an example of what you should not be. But, you could change
>that *IF* you used a brain cell to do more than post mindless dribbel
>about Macs.
>
>Nathan Mates
>--
><*> Nathan Mates http://www.visi.com/~nathan/      <*>
># What are the facts? Again and again and again-- what are the _facts_?
># Shun wishful thinking, avoid opinion, care not what the neighbors
># think-- what are the facts, and to how many decimal places? -R.A.
Heinlein