Re: Nathan vs Rubywand: Choose sides?

[nathan@visi.com (Nathan Mates)]

In article <1998041920453700.QAA19580@ladder03.news.aol.com>,
LJSILICON <ljsilicon@aol.com> wrote:
> There is no proof that Rubywand is a pirate. 

   I suppose you missed rubywanker's telling folks to pirate
Appleworks, a program *still* sold? That's just one of the most
blatant examples in the past month. Rubywanker's continual attempts to
pawn off the pirate site where Appleworks was as in any way
"legitimate" while it's full of copyrighted programs just like
Appleworks is just as much piracy. Rubywanker is like a kid on the
edge of a school yard telling folks to "try this" without mentioning
that what they're doing is WRONG. Thievery is his actions,
sugar-coated are his words. And that dual-faced nature of him is what
needs to be fixed, perferably by having him lose all ties to,
recommendations of, and support for stealing copyrighted software.

   And Rudywanker "LJSilicon" 'Guy' (might big inferiority complex
there), if the Apple II is as "dead" as you claimed it was in a
previous posting, then why don't you do the same with your postings--
kill them off and leave the place to those who care. You're 15
miliseconds of fame are over, and you're the bitter jerk trying to
help those who are killing off real support. Go back to your coffin:
it's daylight.

Nathan Mates
--
<*> Nathan Mates http://www.visi.com/~nathan/      <*>
# What are the facts? Again and again and again-- what are the _facts_?
# Shun wishful thinking, avoid opinion, care not what the neighbors
# think-- what are the facts, and to how many decimal places? -R.A. Heinlein