[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Commodore drives can be controlled on Apple II serial!
- Subject: Re: Commodore drives can be controlled on Apple II serial!
- From: wsmith@NOSPAM.ctron.com (Will Smith)
- Date: 1998/04/06
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: Cabletron Systems Inc.
- References: <6ffc75$8gf$1@opal.southwind.net> <1998032705475801.AAA03103@ladder01.news.aol.com> <6fhkaa$98e$1@opal.southwind.net> <351f9c79.241422317@roch-news> <6fslqj$ql0$1@opal.southwind.net> <352248a0.416591375@roch-news> <6fv8hr$5rc$1@opal.southwind.net> <3524f7a5.592495047@roch-news> <6g3vo2$83d$2@opal.southwind.net>
On 4 Apr 1998 00:43:46 GMT, shack@onyx.southwind.net (Randy
Shackelford) wrote:
|>Well I'd say it follows you hear about "pesky Macs", since they came from
|>the same company and all. If you can't handle it, sorry.
what makes you think i can't "handle it"?!? i've already mentioned
that my distaste for the Mac is a personal thing, and that (given a
choice) i have more tolerance for a Mac user than a WinDOZE user.
|>The Fastpath router I have routes Appletalk out of the box, but if you want
|>to set up Appletalk zones or route TCP or DECnet or the other supported
|>protocols, ya gotta configure it. And that means using a Mac. Again, if you
|>can't handle that, sorry.
that's wonderful if you've got a router at home. i'm thinking on the
small-scale: a HOME network. i want to get things working on a
repeater if i can, because repeaters are (a) cheaper (b) not overkill.
for me to go out and get a router for linking two machines would be
like trying to buy a Lambourghini just to be able to drive it two
miles to the store. (of course, that's a stupid thing to have where i
live. the frost heaves in the late-fall to early spring would destroy
the car in no time...)
|>: show me an ethernet card that allows the //gs to do TCP/IP, and i'll
|>: show you an ecstatic computer geek... :)
|>
|>I'd take ethertalk, but that's all I would need myself. I don't have a modem
|>on my IIgs any more since there aren't any TCP client apps or PPP for that
|>matter.
EtherTalk is a Mac thing, so far as i know... if there was a 10Base-T
connector for the //gs, i'm SURE that somebody would have thought
about using it by now...
---
William Smith
#include <disclaimer.h>
Remove the obvious when sending e-mail...