On Sun, Apr 5, 1998 3:28 PM, Ole Voss <mailto:joker@on-line.de> wrote: >Edwin E. Thorne wrote: > >> The Apple to Commodore analogy is like this: >> >> Apple II = C64 >> AppleIIGS = C65 >> Macintosh= Amiga >> >> There was no Commodore transition from the C64/C65 to the Amiga. No >boards, no emulators, nothing to run C64/C65 stuff on the Amiga. Some >third party emulators came along years later that were slower than a real >C64 on a fast Amiga, and I've never seen a C65 emulator. >> >> On the other hand the C64 does have the advantage of still being in >production. >> >> This message was created and sent using the Cyberdog Mail System > > You have GOT to be kidding! The C65 is definitely not in relation to the >IIGS. >The C65 was crap... and the C64 was definitely no competition to the II! >We're talking Rolls Royce compared to Volkswagen here. In Germany the Cs >were called the Volkscomputer - how's that... > >ole > <Enclosure: vcard.vcf> No, I'm not kidding. The C64 had all the hardware features of the Apple II and a GUI called GEOS too. This message was created and sent using the Cyberdog Mail System
Attachment:
vcard.vcf
Description: Mac BinHex archive