[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OS For IIGS
- Subject: Re: OS For IIGS
- From: !smentzer@ecom.net (Steve Mentzer)
- Date: 1997/12/03
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: Organization? What's that?
- References: <65v5ke$4jo@frogger.lm.com> <g20h.18$hl2.371375@pooh.visi.com> <663rv7$ik7@frogger.lm.com>
>
>All the apps are flying. No problems here. In fact, the other night I
>pulled an evil kanival (sp?) and played GLquake while *burning a CD* - I
>was sure I would toast the disc - but it didn't. And it was under 95. No
>MacOS machine will *ever* do that.
>
And the truth is that a suite of well balanced Cooperative multitasking
machines will perform as well (in some cases better) as a pre-emptive
multitasking OS kernel.
However!
Mike Horwath's original argument was that Win95 does not perform pre-emptive
multitasking at the kernel level. And he wanted you to prove it. Facts are
facts, and the entire Win95 kernel and Win32 subsystem are premptively
multitasked. He will deny this to his dying day. If you do provide proof, he
will slam bill gates to prove his illogical point.
The problem is that you will never be able to prove to this nut that you are
right. He is the self-proclaimed guru of all OS's. He knows what the
users want. Lately his only arguments have been to criticize the manufacturers
of marketing and technical spoofs, instead of relying on fact and substance.
Sounds like a real genius.
It's no suprise that him and Nathan are buddies.
smentzer@pacbell.net