Re: Fwd: Re: Solutions in Modernizing GS

[pubpc1@library.ucla.edu]

B.J. Major wrote:
Lewin A.R.W. Edwards, sysadm@zws.com wrote:
> I feel I answered all the issues in there quite adequately, though I
> didn't feel it necessary to quote or reply to every single *word* you
> wrote. Of course, part of the problem is that in the fine tradition of
> someone without much of a leg to stand on, every time the going gets
> tough the subject gets changed. The original subject was purely about
> the  IIgs - *you* started the divergence.

Sticks and stones. I made valid points and the messages from other
people that B.J. did not forward to you agree with those points,
such as stepwise upgrade with a single step of backward compat.
rather than cutting backward compat. in a single step and going
cold turkey.

You can't seem to address those points, maybe because they hit
home and are dead on.

> 
> >Why is it that both you and he seem to think that the Mac is the
> >best computer in the world and rag on everything else, PC, GS, or
> 
> Why is it that both you and a few other people seem to think that the GS
> is the best computer in the world and rag on everything else, PC, Amiga
> or Mac,

Hmm, I've defended the PC, the Amiga, and non-Apple PowerMac clones
right here on csa2.

>unless you're trying to force a particularly indigestible point
> down someone else's throat and need some so-called evidence to back it
> up? Sheesh, some GS users!

Whatever.

-Scott G.