Re: Duellin' FAQtions: a solution?

[dr_buzz@hotmail.com]

In article <3439E937.1834@swbell.net>, Rubywand says...
>
>Pres Nevins writes ...
>> 
>> I've been lurking here for one, count 'em, one day, and am already amazed...
>>
>
>     Many long-time csa2 readers have been pretty amazed, too!
> 

I'm amazed.  At the stupidity and cult-like following of you turdley-ites.
Fortunately, 2000 sin't that far off, and you'll probably all kill yourselves.


>     Actually, regular posting of the FAQ's to csa2 is not, strictly speaking, 
>required of the FAQ Keeper. What is required is that access to the FAQ's via a 
>site on the internet be free, open, and unrestricted to _all_ users.
>
> 
>> The first option is dependent on the FAQ maintainer giving up his
>> determination to have this other guy disappear.
>
>     That would entail a surprising leap in maturity. For now, it is 
>sufficient that the idea of using our FAQ's as a weapon be abandoned.
>
>

No, it would require a surprising leap in intelligence among the turdley-ites.

>
>     Yes. It is taking far too long to settle a situation for which the 
>options and outcomes were always clear. Perhaps the still-current FAQ Keeper 
>will 'see the light'; perhaps not. Soon, it may not matter. In any case, it 
>seems obvious that members can no longer permit limiting csa2's FAQ's to a 
>single site.
>

You'll see the light yourself when you take your lips off of turdley's ass.

>
>Rubywand
Butt muncher