[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: NATHAN and the FAQ Dilemna

Subject: Re: NATHAN and the FAQ Dilemna
From: sheldon@atlcom.net (Sheldon Simms)
Date: 1997/10/06
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: none
References: <61380i$bhd$1@client2.news.psi.net> <6138st$367$1@darla.visi.com> <bjblackbear-0310971044280001@slip129-37-106-179.wa.us.ibm.net> <619cn9$lin$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au>

In article <619cn9$lin$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au>,
pfg@yallara.cs.rmit.EDU.AU (Paul Francis Gilbert) wrote:

> > It's very obvious that by siding
> >with your client Mr. Mates, you're already advocating censorship.
> 
> Not to mention that you're at least breaking US law, and probably the laws of
> many other countries as well. As was previous pointed out...

It would be more correct to say that it was asserted, not that it was pointed
out. It's not likely Nathan is breaking the law by banning certain domains
from his web site. He is being silly.

-- 
W. Sheldon Simms III   |   2000 is *still* the 20th century
sheldon@atlcom.net     |

Follow-Ups:
- Re: NATHAN and the FAQ Dilemna
  - From: pfg@yallara.cs.rmit.EDU.AU (Paul Francis Gilbert)

References:
- NATHAN and the FAQ Dilemna
  - From: !smentzer@pacbell.net (Steve Mentzer)
- Re: NATHAN and the FAQ Dilemna
  - From: bjblackbear@ibm.net (B.J. Major)
- Re: NATHAN and the FAQ Dilemna
  - From: pfg@yallara.cs.rmit.EDU.AU (Paul Francis Gilbert)

Prev by Date: Codename G-OS
Next by Date: Re: R. Odyssey Minefield
Previous by thread: Re: NATHAN and the FAQ Dilemna
Next by thread: Re: NATHAN and the FAQ Dilemna
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread