Re: NATHAN and the FAQ Dilemna

[Rubywand <rubywand@swbell.net>]

Kirk E. Mitchell writes ...
> 
> Sheesh... Nathan get jumped on constantly for telling people
> to read the FAQ,

     Yes; the present FAQ Keeper has tended to over-do references to the 
FAQ's. He weathered the criticisms well enough.

     It is easy to respect toughness and technical competence. It is 
impossible to respect or tolerate actions such as using csa2's FAQ's as a 
weapon against csa2 members.  


> and now the Turleymite's whine about NOT having
> the FAQ.
>

     It appears that "whine" is supposed characterize the numerous 
informed, cogent postings by B.J. Major, Edward Franks, and other csa2 
members on the FAQ's issue. Would a response placing you among "inept 
bunglers" engender an attitude favorable to problem solving? Probably not.

 
> My feeling?  He put them in html form.  He can do what he likes with 'em.
>

     While, no doubt, springing from pure motivations, this "feeling" about 
disposition of copyrighted csa2 property and violations of Federal 
anti-descrimination statutes is likely to prove a less than reliable 
pointer to Reality.

     Access to csa2 FAQ's must be free, unrestricted, and open, without 
exception, to all Apple II users. 


Rubywand