Re: New FAQ sites? (was Re: Nathan does it again!)

[nathan@visi.com (Nathan Mates)]

In article <199710050854001610327@[195.4.198.252]>,
Udo Huth <udo.huth@auge.de> wrote:
>Owsw <owsw@aol.com> wrote:
>> Why not?  Your claiming that 2000 is *still* the 20th century :)  So, what
>>  books were you going to put on your web site anyway?
>Yes, indeed it is. As there was no year 0 (zero, naught), but counting
>started with year 1 (-2, -1, 1, 2, ...), the new century starts with
>year 2001.

   May I remind you that you're trying to argue with Charles Turley
posting from aol. No matter how much the facts are, it remains that
he's incapable of learning this or anything else. [And Turkey's
cronies share the same level of incompetence in trying to deny the
lack of a year zero precisely becasue it reminds them of their IQ]

Nathan Mates

--
<*> Nathan Mates http://www.visi.com/~nathan/      <*>
# This posting is copyright Nathan Mates, and may not be reprinted
# in full, partial, or quoted form on any archive site associated with
# Charles Turley.