Re: The Apple II Constitution - Lets call a TRUCE

[cturley@grin.net]

In article <5snmmj$ifp@news1.intelenet.net>,
  eshepher@quicksilver.com (Eric Shepherd) wrote:
>
> Additionally, it would immensely disturb me to see in writing
> "permission" to distribute copyrighted software, even if it's no
> longer available.  It's still illegal, even though I wouldn't freak
> out over it.
>
> To the FBI, it's as good as an admission of guilt. :)
>
> Eric Shepherd
> * My opinions are my own; any attempts to blame them on
> * someone else will prove futile.

Then let the FBI deal with it!	Who should you bother if it's not your
software in question? I'd conclude by reading the partial comments above
without seeing the original post content that you were condeming; the
Treasure Chest Project or the Beagle Bros. freeware or even the
"premission" to distribute the Medley GS program.  All are still
copyright software and premission was granted to distribute them. Why
would you be immensely disturbed over such distribution? And, if you see
premission in writing to distribute it, why is it still illigal?

Do you catch my drift now on the misinterpretation of
posts and the reply to the originals?

Cheers,
Tom

-------------------==== Posted via Deja News ====-----------------------
      http://www.dejanews.com/     Search, Read, Post to Usenet