Re: Brutal Deluxe in California...

[Dave Morrison <deth@healey.com.au>]

richard.b@genie.com wrote:

> Dave Morrison <deth@healey.com.au> writes:
>
> >I'll tell you what, bennett......I hear you live in Sydney....so
> why
> >don't you and I meet up. Let's see how much balls you have when
> you're
>
> And get beaten to a pulp by a muscle man? No thanks

>
>
> >not sitting behind you pc where you can be big and tough and slag
> off
>
> Big and tough? No, just stating my opinion. If you don't like it,
> ignore it
> or respond instead of threatening to beat the shit out of someone.

I never threatened anyone with violence. After spending the last four
years or so on the net and having people always abusing others and
calling them names etc. when they are sitting behind their PCs, I'm
getting a little tired of it. It is a total act of cowardice to take
refuge behind a computer and call people names when it's quite obvious
that the person would not have the guts to call someone anything to
their face. I was asking you if you had the guts to actually say
something to my face, in real life, rather than doing it while
cowering behind a computer. Obviously you do not.


>
>
> >all the time. Let's see if you have the balls to call me a stupid
> jerk
> >and tell me to shut the hell up to my face. Well?? I'll be waiting
> for
>
> If you need to resort to violence to win an argument, your argument
> must be
> unwinnable.

As I said above, there was no threatening of violence. And as for
needing to win an argument, incase you didn't notice, there was no
argument. I stated my opinion. You stated yours but resorted to name
calling. It was not an 'argument' that could be won or lost.


>
>
> So the bigger you are physically, the more correct you are? You're
> right
> because you can beat the shit out of someone? Sounds like fascism to
> me.
>

I could go into a heated discussion on survial of the fittest and
might is right, but it would be a pointless debate, especially in this
newsgroup.  As I said, no-one was correct or incorrect in our posts.
It was not a discussion, rather a statement of opinions. And as for
fascism, if you are going to classify me into such an extreme
political view, I'd rather be classified as a Nazi. Though it doesn't
fit.....it fits better than a fascist.


> >your reply. And dont email me....let the world see what a man you
> >are....in this newsgroup!!!
>
> I wouldn't waste bandwidth. Your original post says it all I think.

Im afraid you just wasted bandwidth with your cowardly reply.

Dave