[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Reverse Engineering-- Why Not?

Subject: Re: Reverse Engineering-- Why Not?
From: dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson)
Date: 1997/05/01
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: Empsoft
References: <5k56nt$937@senator-bedfellow.MIT.EDU> <33678488.5587082@news.healey.com.au>

Dave <deth@healey.com.au> wrote:

> On 29 Apr 1997 16:13:49 GMT, mike@athena.mit.edu (Michael T Decerbo)
> wrote:
> 
> [Why not reverse engineer the Apple II Ethernet Card?]
> 
> Mike,
>          I must say that you have had an excellent idea. I don't know
> why none of us have ever thought of this in the first place.

There are undoubtedly legal issues - everyone who has the card probably
had to sign a non-disclosure agreement, and there are probably clauses
preventing disassembly, reverse engineering, etc.

-- 
David Empson
dempson@actrix.gen.nz
Snail mail: P.O. Box 27-103, Wellington, New Zealand

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Reverse Engineering-- Why Not?
  - From: wernst@cris.com (Warren "Llama" Ernst)

References:
- Reverse Engineering-- Why Not?
  - From: mike@athena.mit.edu (Michael T Decerbo)
- Re: Reverse Engineering-- Why Not?
  - From: deth@healey.com.au (Dave)

Prev by Date: Re: Appletalk on IIC
Next by Date: Re: Beyond 8 meg limit?
Previous by thread: Re: Reverse Engineering-- Why Not?
Next by thread: Re: Reverse Engineering-- Why Not?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread