Re: best format for distribution (SHK? DSK? ZIP?)

["N.N. Thayer" <nnthayer@hotmail.com>]

On Jul 31, 2:11 pm, Ivan X <ivan...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hello A2 world,
>
> If I'm planning on distributing more of the Apple II software I've written
> on my web page, what's considered to be the best format(s) for distribution
> these days?
>
> The reason I ask is that I pretty much spend my time in Apple //e emulators,
> so I'm biased towards 140K disk image files because they're most convenient
> for me, and also quickly converted to disks via ADT Pro for those who are
> set up to do so.
>
> However, I realize some users download directly to their Apple II's,
> especially IIgs users; if so, I'd think image files would be less convenient
> because they require making back into disks, or utilities are needed to
> extract files from them, and I'm not even sure what exists for that, if
> anything.
>
> So, what's best? DSK? SDK? ZIP? SHK? 800K(PO)? Some combination of these?
> Something else?
>
> As an aside, what zip decoders exist? Any for 8-bit machines? Likewise, are
> there any tools for extracting files from disk images? (I wrote a
> ProDOS-based utility for extracting files from 3.3 images many years ago,
> which was crude but functional, and may be one of the items I want to put up
> if there isn't something better out there.)
>
> Thanks,
> Ivan.
>
> --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: n...@netfront.net ---

I've found DSK to be the best format for what I work with - which is
almost strictly 140K DOS 3.3/ProDOS disks, for use with ADTPro and
AppleWin.  For all my imaging and testing, this has been the single
most convenient format and I've never seen a reason to switch away,
except for copy-protection issues.