Re: MICRO Magazines Library Now Complete

["bill.martens@gmail.com" <bill.martens@gmail.com>]

On Jul 28, 11:15 pm, Mike <magin...@computist-project.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 07:58:47 -0600, Mike
>
>
>
> <magin...@computist-project.net> wrote:
> >On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 07:12:38 -0700 (PDT), Calibrator
> ><calibra...@freenet.de> wrote:
>
> >>On Jul 27, 10:53 am, "Michael J. Mahon" <mjma...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >>> Great news, Bill--and thanks to all who made this possible.
>
> >>Yes, it's definitely a wealth of information. I always thought micro
> >>was strictly for the single-board computers of the early eighties
> >>so this was a positive surprise.
> >>I also like the "no compromise" hi-res full-color approach of the
> >>newer scans.
>
> >>> It does look like "micro_50_jul_1982.pdf" is damaged, though.  ;-(
>
> >>You may want to try downloading it again as I had no problems
> >>with the file.
> >>It's 126,385,707 bytes large, by the way, and a scroll-through
> >>showed no problems (I use the Foxit PDF viewer).
>
> >>bye
> >>Marcus
>
> >Hmm.  I'm having the same problem as Michael.  Acrobat tells me it's
> >not a valid PDF, though I'm seeing the file as being 41,934,848 bytes
> >- about the same size as all the others.  Foxit Reader also chokes on
> >it...
>
> >Issues 48, 49 and 51 also fail to open.
>
> >- Mike
>
> Hmm.  I was able to get good copies using Firefox instead of Chrome.
> Weird.
>
> - Mike

I have downloaded and checked all 4 with Acrobat and absolutely no
issues exist.   Could it be that your downloads of the issues are not
completing?  That is the only thing I can see that would cause the
file size difference and then naturally it would not open.

--billm--