[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: //c vs. //c+: which is best?

Subject: Re: //c vs. //c+: which is best?
From: shack@deimos.frii.com (Randy Shackelford)
Date: 1997/01/17
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: Front Range Internet, Inc, Fort Collins, Colorado
References: <32DEDE42.543D@asu.edu>

In article <32DEDE42.543D@asu.edu>, Kelton Rhoads  <kelton@asu.edu> wrote:
>I have the chance to purchase either a //c or a //c+. I want to use it 
>with appleworks at the office, and then take a 3.5 disk home and 
>translate to my Macintosh Quadra. Which would be my best choice: the 
>//c with a unidisk, or the //c+? 

A //c plus beats the snot out of a //c. It has an internal 3.5, 4 MHz clock,
memory expansion capability, serial ports compatible with Mac and IIgs cables,
a nicer keyboard, and that grey external 3.5 you have will work with it.
-- 
Randy Shackelford                                 
shack@frii.com

References:
- //c vs. //c+: which is best?
  - From: Kelton Rhoads <kelton@asu.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: GS emmulator
Next by Date: Re: Looking for Gary Utter
Previous by thread: Re: //c vs. //c+: which is best?
Next by thread: Re: //c vs. //c+: which is best?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread