Re: RFC- Applesoft FAQ started

[nathan@visi.com (Nathan Mates)]

In article <5a9j1t$meg@nntp.ucs.ubc.ca>,
Tim Shoppa <shoppa@alph02.triumf.ca> wrote:
>You show me an existing PEEKs/POKEs chart that isn't riddled with
>inaccuracies and I'll give you a handfull of loonies.

   Well, you could cheat and say "this chart is good only for a ][+
with 48-64K of RAM running real-DOS 3.3 and Applesoft in ROM" and be a
lot less inaccurate. Too many of those lists date back to that era,
and really fail to note that.

   It's almost 1997, and the Apple II world has moved beyond 1982-83.
Therefore, those lists need *major* work. Replacing them with a list
done correctly rather than patching holes in things is far better.

Nathan "Did I mention I low-level HDs at signs of trouble? :)" Mates

--
<*> Nathan Mates http://www.visi.com/~nathan/      <*>
# What are the facts? Again and again and again-- what are the _facts_?
# Shun wishful thinking, avoid opinion, care not what the neighbors
# think-- what are the facts, and to how many decimal places?  -R.A. Heinlein