Re: New IIgs Accelerator.... Wow!

[magnusfalkirk <dean.phares@gmail.com>]

On Jun 11, 9:28 pm, madmax_2...@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid
(madmax2069) wrote:
> Asking someone if they should consider is different then telling them
> to redesign the damn thing. Its like i was holding a damn gun to
> their heads or something. i am pissed on HOW they treated me and
> responded towards me, THAT is why i i wont buy nothing from them.
>
> I could care less what anyone does, if you buy one more power to you.
> but i wont support no one that treats people like that.
>
> i am done on the subject. They was 100% rude towards me. they had no
> reason to reply like they did period. they could have responded allot
> nicer then they did.
>
> and when i said
>
>  they should consider a card design over a drop in CPU
> replacement
>
> i meant that as a question not a demand in the email
>
> it should have been put
>
> Should they consider a Card design over a CPU drop in replacement.
>
> That is how it should have been.

Just my own two cents here but maybe you should consider learning how
to ask a question before you point fingers at people for being snotty
in a reply. A polite way to have worded your question would have been
something like this "Is there a chance you might consider making it a
card to go into a slot instead of a CPU replacement?" using should
sounds like you are telling them how do design their product. (and
remember when you are point at someone there are THREE other fingers
pointed back at you.)

For myself I welcome the idea of a new accelerator for the GS. It's
been frustrating watching ePay auctions for Transwarp GS or Zip GS(X)
and see the price climb to several hundred dollars. Granted Apple
should have made the GS A LOT FASTER from the start but knowing that
some one is working on a new way to make it run faster is nice. Now I
can just hope that they won't want my left arm, left leg and left
kidney as the price for it. ;-)

Dean