[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: two agendas of artificial intelligence



Justin Thiesen (justin@mailhost.ecn.uoknor.edu) wrote:

: ><deletia completely unrelated to the apple 2>
: >>
: >>
: ><Nathan Mates asking the poster to fix the bug that caused their news-
: >reader to post to an unrelated group>

: No, Nathan is not god, and I see these unrelated posts too, but on some

You're right, he's not.  But why does he insist on acting liking it?

: groups the unrelated posts have risen to a level which is drowning out
: the on-topic community.  Maybe it won't erase the noise level, but 
: efforts like his may help to keep it to a manageable level.  Ignoring

So why doesn't he make these efforts via e-mail?  What possible advantage
is there to making a public proclamation of the fact that a message
is off-topic, other than to demonstrate his self-conceived notion of
almightiness?  So what if the offender gets multiple e-mails telling
him/her of the transgression?  All the better in preventing a similar
mistake in the future.  At least it doesn't waste newsgroup bandwidth.
Nathan is MORE guilty of generating off-topic messages because he
propagates the off-topic message into a full-blown thread.
-- 
Sam
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Computer Historian, Programmer, Musician, Philosopher, Athlete, Writer, Jackass