[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CP/M on //e?
- Subject: Re: CP/M on //e?
- From: dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson)
- Date: 1996/10/13
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: Empsoft
- References: <53aeoe$bsf@newsflash.concordia.ca> <53c2lj$2066@news.gate.net> <53l300$552@newsflash.concordia.ca>
Doug Spence <ds_spenc@alcor.concordia.ca> wrote:
> Louis Schulman (louiss@gate.net) wrote:
>
> : What you evidently have is a timing problem that occurs with certain
> : coprocessor cards (like the Z-80) and certain versions of the //e. The
> : fact that you have a Revision A may be relevent, because this problem
> : does not occur for everyone.
>
> Argh! How was the timing changed between the ][+ and //e, and why?
> (Oops, that looks rather technical. ;) )
Yes, it is.
There are some differences in the timing of DMA (direct memory access)
transfers : a card which uses DMA must set up the address a little
earlier on a IIe than on a ][. Most Z80 cards make use of DMA, so this
is the area which will cause the most trouble.
--
David Empson
dempson@actrix.gen.nz
Snail Mail: P.O. Box 27-103, Wellington, New Zealand