Re: When you can't prove anything, just flame

[dalloff@freenet.columbus.oh.us (Dave Althoff)]

Richard (KILPATRICK@Tank.CYBERphile.co.uk) wrote:
(quoting someone whose ID I snipped...sorry...)
: >   When I talk about the Apple II line, I talk about the following:
: >the IIGS, the //e, //c, IIc+, ][+, and Apple ][. Each based on what
: >its name tends to appear as on the case and/or startup screen.

: Normally I wouldn't follow this is up. But, for once, Hear Hear.

: As a dedicated user of ][, // and II in the CORRECT place, I can only
: agree with this.Exept I use lower case IIgs, as on the case :).

Well, I tend to refer to the Apple ][, Apple ][+, Apple ][e, Apple //e
(quick way to distinguish between the original ][e and the enhanced //e,
don't you think?), //c, //c+, and IIgs.  Though I may have used "][gs" on
occasion just to be contrary.  And for me, the generic family name is Apple
][.

Of course, then there is my signature, which I type a little differently
when I am typing Apple ]['s than when I am typing roller coasters...

--Dave Althoff, ][.
-- 
    /-\      Celebrating the International Year of the Roller Coaster
   /XXX\      /X\     /X\_      _     /XX\_      _     _        _____  
  /XXXXX\    /XXX\  _/XXXX\_   /X\   /XXXXX\    /X\   /X\      /XXXXX
_/XXXXXXX\__/XXXXX\/XXXXXXXX\_/XXX\_/XXXXXXX\__/XXX\_/XXX\_/\_/XXXXXX